Comments on: Revisit of Link Growth – Sleeping Giant http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/ Search Concepts – SEO Blog by Joe Griffin Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:28:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Joe Griffin http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/#comment-40 Joe Griffin Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:44:41 +0000 http://www.searchconcepts.com/?p=151#comment-40 Hi Jason, I think the search engines also categorize them, blogs in particular. Thanks for reading the post :) Hi Jason, I think the search engines also categorize them, blogs in particular. Thanks for reading the post :)

]]> By: Joe Griffin http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/#comment-42 Joe Griffin Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:44:00 +0000 http://www.searchconcepts.com/?p=151#comment-42 Hi Jason, I think the search engines also categorize them, blogs in particular. Thanks for reading the post :) Hi Jason, I think the search engines also categorize them, blogs in particular. Thanks for reading the post :)

]]> By: Joe Griffin http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/#comment-46 Joe Griffin Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:44:00 +0000 http://www.searchconcepts.com/?p=151#comment-46 Hi Jason, I think the search engines also categorize them, blogs in particular. Thanks for reading the post :) Hi Jason, I think the search engines also categorize them, blogs in particular. Thanks for reading the post :)

]]> By: Jason Hulott http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/#comment-39 Jason Hulott Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:54:21 +0000 http://www.searchconcepts.com/?p=151#comment-39 Hey Joe, Good post. People simply tend to go for volume of links and forget relevance of the linking page, and like a trip to the dentist only do it once a year, so natural historical link growth is non existent. And people wonder why they struggle! Not sure I agree with point 4 on link types. I understand we can categorise them, but does Google? Keep up the good work... Jason Hey Joe,

Good post. People simply tend to go for volume of links and forget relevance of the linking page, and like a trip to the dentist only do it once a year, so natural historical link growth is non existent. And people wonder why they struggle!

Not sure I agree with point 4 on link types. I understand we can categorise them, but does Google?

Keep up the good work…

Jason

]]> By: Jason Hulott http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/#comment-41 Jason Hulott Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:54:00 +0000 http://www.searchconcepts.com/?p=151#comment-41 Hey Joe, Good post. People simply tend to go for volume of links and forget relevance of the linking page, and like a trip to the dentist only do it once a year, so natural historical link growth is non existent. And people wonder why they struggle! Not sure I agree with point 4 on link types. I understand we can categorise them, but does Google? Keep up the good work... Jason Hey Joe,

Good post. People simply tend to go for volume of links and forget relevance of the linking page, and like a trip to the dentist only do it once a year, so natural historical link growth is non existent. And people wonder why they struggle!

Not sure I agree with point 4 on link types. I understand we can categorise them, but does Google?

Keep up the good work…

Jason

]]> By: Jason Hulott http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/#comment-45 Jason Hulott Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:54:00 +0000 http://www.searchconcepts.com/?p=151#comment-45 Hey Joe, Good post. People simply tend to go for volume of links and forget relevance of the linking page, and like a trip to the dentist only do it once a year, so natural historical link growth is non existent. And people wonder why they struggle! Not sure I agree with point 4 on link types. I understand we can categorise them, but does Google? Keep up the good work... Jason Hey Joe,

Good post. People simply tend to go for volume of links and forget relevance of the linking page, and like a trip to the dentist only do it once a year, so natural historical link growth is non existent. And people wonder why they struggle!

Not sure I agree with point 4 on link types. I understand we can categorise them, but does Google?

Keep up the good work…

Jason

]]> By: Posts about SEO as of June 23, 2009 | Ebusiness Blog http://searchconcepts.com/2009/06/23/linkgrowth/#comment-38 Posts about SEO as of June 23, 2009 | Ebusiness Blog Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:28:18 +0000 http://www.searchconcepts.com/?p=151#comment-38 [...] the internet age, using Google, and other high tech companies, as a model. The rules have changed Revisit of Link Growth - Sleeping Giant - searchconcepts.com 06/23/2009 Originally published by Joe Griffin in Visibility Magazine in [...] [...] the internet age, using Google, and other high tech companies, as a model. The rules have changed Revisit of Link Growth – Sleeping Giant – searchconcepts.com 06/23/2009 Originally published by Joe Griffin in Visibility Magazine in [...]

]]>